PFF vs PFFD vs PGX - Best preferred stock ETF for income stability

Preferred stock ETFs are a popular choice for income-focused investors seeking reliable monthly dividends. These funds combine the features of stocks and bonds, offering fixed payments with less volatility than common stocks. But which ETF - PFF, PFFD, or PGX - is the best fit for your portfolio? Here's a quick breakdown:

• PFF: The largest and most established, it offers broad exposure, high liquidity, and a dividend yield around 6.4%. However, its expense ratio (0.45%) is higher than PFFD.
• PFFD: A cost-effective option with the lowest expense ratio (0.23%) and access to institutional markets. Its yield (5.8%-6.8%) is competitive, but liquidity is lower than PFF.
• PGX: Focuses on higher yields (6.0%-7.0%) but comes with increased credit risk and the highest expense ratio (0.51%).

Quick takeaway:

• Choose PFF for stability and liquidity.
• Opt for PFFD if low fees are your priority.
• Go with PGX if maximizing income is your main goal, but be mindful of the risks.

Quick Comparison

ETF	Expense Ratio	Dividend Yield	Liquidity (Daily Volume)	Credit Quality	Risk Level	Best For
PFF	0.45%	6.4%	High ($100M+)	60% BBB+	Moderate	Reliable income stability
PFFD	0.23%	5.8%-6.8%	Moderate ($5M-$10M)	65% BBB+	Moderate	Cost-conscious investors
PGX	0.51%	6.0%-7.0%	Adequate ($30M-$40M)	40% BBB or lower	Higher credit risk	High-income seekers

Each ETF has strengths and trade-offs. PFF is the most stable, PFFD is the cheapest, and PGX offers the highest yields but with added risk. Your choice depends on your income needs, risk tolerance, and cost considerations.

ETF Battles: Which High Dividend Preferred Securities ETF is Right Choice?

Analysis of Each ETF

Here’s a closer look at the structure and performance metrics of each ETF, highlighting key details to help assess income stability.

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF)

First launched in 2007, PFF is the largest and most established preferred stock ETF, managing over $13 billion in assets. It tracks the ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, offering broad exposure to U.S. dollar-denominated preferred securities traded on exchanges.

• Expense Ratio: 0.45% ($45 per $10,000 invested annually)
• Portfolio Composition: Roughly 300 securities, with 70% allocated to the financial sector (banks, insurance companies, and other institutions). The remaining 30% includes utilities, energy, and REITs.
• Dividend Yield: Typically between 5.5% and 6.5%, paid monthly, appealing to those seeking regular cash flow.
• Interest Rate Sensitivity: Vulnerable to rising rates. For example, during the Federal Reserve's aggressive rate hikes in 2022, PFF saw a 15% decline.
• Credit Quality: About 60% of holdings are rated BBB or higher, striking a balance between yield and safety. However, it carries somewhat higher credit risk than pure investment-grade bond funds.
• Duration: Around 5 years, meaning a 1% interest rate increase could reduce the fund’s value by approximately 5%.
• Liquidity: Exceptional, with daily trading volumes exceeding $100 million, allowing easy entry and exit for investors.

Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX)

Launched in 2008, PGX emphasizes credit quality and diversification, managing about $5 billion in assets. It tracks the ICE BofA Core Plus Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index.

• Expense Ratio: 0.51% ($51 per $10,000 invested annually), the highest among the three ETFs.
• Portfolio Composition: Approximately 250 securities, with 65% in financials and 35% spread across utilities, energy, and telecommunications.
• Dividend Yield: Between 6.0% and 7.0%, the highest among the three ETFs, reflecting its inclusion of lower-rated securities. About 40% of its portfolio is rated below investment grade, increasing credit risk alongside income potential.
• Volatility: Higher than PFF. For instance, during the March 2020 COVID-19 market turbulence, PGX dropped 25% compared to PFF’s 20% decline.
• Liquidity: Adequate, with daily trading volumes of $30 million to $40 million - sufficient for most investors.
• Duration: Similar to PFF at around 5 years, indicating comparable sensitivity to interest rate changes.

Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD)

Launched in 2017, PFFD stands out with its low-cost structure and focus on the institutional OTC preferred market. It manages around $1.5 billion in assets and tracks the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index.

• Expense Ratio: 0.23% ($23 per $10,000 invested annually), the most cost-effective option. Over time, this lower fee structure can result in significant savings.
• Portfolio Composition: Around 250 securities, with 70% in financials and 30% in other sectors. Its access to the institutional OTC market provides exposure to securities not available to retail investors, potentially offering better pricing and terms.
• Dividend Yield: Ranges from 5.8% to 6.8%, with monthly distributions offering steady income.
• Credit Quality: About 65% of holdings are rated BBB or higher, offering better credit quality than PGX while maintaining competitive yields.
• Performance History: Although newer, PFFD has delivered returns comparable to or slightly better than PFF, all while keeping costs lower.
• Liquidity: Average daily trading volumes range from $5 million to $10 million. While adequate for most individual investors, larger trades may face slight price impacts. The bid-ask spread is wider than PFF’s but remains manageable for typical investments.
• Market Cycle Testing: With a shorter track record, PFFD hasn’t faced as many market cycles as its counterparts. However, its performance during the 2022 rate hikes and 2020 pandemic volatility suggests its strategy holds up well under stress.

Each ETF brings its own strengths and trade-offs, whether it’s PFF’s liquidity and established history, PGX’s higher yield with increased risk, or PFFD’s cost efficiency and exposure to unique securities.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Key Metrics

When comparing these three ETFs, some important differences come to light, especially for investors focused on generating income. Among these, expense ratios stand out as a crucial factor, as they directly impact net returns.

Expense Ratios and Costs

Looking at costs, PFFD emerges as the most affordable option, with an annual expense ratio of 0.23%. In comparison, PFF charges a higher 0.45%, while PGX comes in at 0.50%, which could eat into its net yield over time.

Steven Orlowski, a financial expert, underscores the importance of keeping fees low:

"The lower fees can help maximize net returns over time." - Steven Orlowski, CFP®, CNPR®, Orlowski's Financial Counsel

Lower fees are not just about saving money - they play a vital role in boosting long-term compounding. For income-focused investors, minimizing costs is essential to maintaining and growing income streams over time. This cost difference can make a significant impact on overall returns.

sbb-itb-e429e5c

Best ETF for Different Investor Types

Different ETFs cater to varying investment priorities, making it essential to align your choice with your specific financial goals.

Conservative Income Seekers

If your primary focus is steady, reliable income with minimal price fluctuations, PFF stands out as a strong option. As the largest preferred stock ETF by assets under management, PFF offers excellent liquidity and a proven track record. With a 6.4% SEC yield, it provides attractive monthly distributions while maintaining relatively stable pricing compared to more volatile equity investments.

PFF's size and maturity make it less prone to dramatic price swings during periods of market turbulence. This stability is especially appealing for retirees or anyone relying on consistent monthly income.

For those prioritizing cost efficiency, however, other ETFs may offer additional advantages.

Cost-Conscious Investors

If keeping fees low to maximize long-term returns is your priority, PFFD is a standout choice. With an expense ratio of just 0.23% - half that of PFF and less than half of PGX - PFFD's lower costs can significantly impact your returns over time, especially as fees compound.

Steven Orlowski, CFP®, CNPR®, from Orlowski's Financial Counsel, highlights this advantage:

"PFFD is an attractive choice for cost-conscious investors, boasting one of the lowest expense ratios in the preferred stock ETF space. The fund provides broad exposure to U.S. preferred stocks while delivering solid monthly income. The lower fees can help maximize net returns over time."

PFFD matches PFF's dividend yield at 6.4%, so more of your income stays in your pocket rather than going toward fees. Over a 10-year period, a $100,000 investment in PFFD could save you thousands in fees compared to higher-cost alternatives, allowing you to reinvest dividends and grow your wealth more effectively.

Diversification-Focused Investors

For investors aiming to prioritize diversification, the preferred stock ETF landscape presents unique challenges. Both PFF and PGX are heavily concentrated in the financial sector, as banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions dominate the preferred stock market. This inherent sector concentration limits diversification within these ETFs.

Among the three options, PFF provides the broadest exposure, with its portfolio spanning various financial subsectors, from regional banks to global insurance firms. While this wider range of holdings helps distribute risk across more companies, it does not eliminate the financial sector's dominance.

Achieving true diversification with preferred stocks may require looking beyond these mainstream ETFs. Since all three funds tend to move in tandem during financial sector stress, investors should evaluate whether preferred stocks align with their overall portfolio strategy. To reduce reliance on the financial sector, consider blending one of these ETFs with other fixed-income investments, such as corporate bonds, Treasury securities, or dividend-paying stocks from non-financial sectors. This approach can create a more balanced and diversified portfolio.

Summary and Final Recommendation

Key Metrics Summary

The three preferred stock ETFs - PFF, PFFD, and PGX - each offer monthly income but vary in ways that can shape your investment experience. PFF, with its large size and high liquidity, ensures tighter bid-ask spreads and smoother trading. It provides a balanced yield alongside moderate fees, making it a dependable middle-ground option.

PFFD stands out for its competitive yield paired with the lowest fees at 0.23%, which can enhance returns over time. However, its smaller asset base may lead to slightly reduced liquidity.

PGX delivers the highest monthly income, appealing to those focused on maximizing payouts. That said, this higher yield comes with increased expenses and a portfolio skewed toward lower-rated preferred securities, introducing additional credit risk.

All three ETFs are heavily concentrated in the financial sector, which can limit diversification during periods of market stress. These differences are critical in shaping the final recommendation for investors seeking stable income.

Final Recommendation for Income Stability

Based on the analysis of performance, fees, and risk profiles, PFF stands out as the most reliable choice for investors prioritizing income stability. Its large scale, deep liquidity, and established track record ensure consistent monthly distributions while minimizing price volatility.

While PFF doesn’t offer the lowest fees or the highest yield, its balance of income and stability makes it a strong option for conservative investors. For those willing to trade some liquidity for cost efficiency, PFFD is an appealing alternative, as its lower fees can support better long-term returns.

For investors seeking maximum monthly income and willing to accept higher credit risk, PGX could be a suitable choice. However, its exposure to lower-rated securities makes it less ideal for those focused on strict income stability.

Preferred stock ETFs are best viewed as part of a diversified fixed-income portfolio. Pairing any of these ETFs with assets like Treasury securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, or dividend-paying stocks from other sectors can help build a more balanced and resilient income stream.

FAQs

What should I consider when deciding between PFF, PFFD, and PGX for stable income?

When deciding among PFF, PFFD, and PGX for income stability, it's essential to weigh factors like performance, dividend yields, expense ratios, and risk profiles. These aspects play a major role in determining how reliable and consistent your investment income will be.

Think about how each ETF fits your financial objectives. If keeping costs low is your priority, take a close look at their expense ratios. On the other hand, if consistent income is what you're after, focus on their dividend history and how steady the yields have been over time. Don't overlook the risk level of the underlying assets - it's important to ensure it aligns with your risk tolerance and long-term investment strategy.

How does the credit quality of an ETF's holdings impact its risk and potential returns?

The credit quality of an ETF's holdings is a critical factor in shaping its risk and return characteristics. ETFs that invest in higher-quality preferred securities tend to offer more consistency and are less prone to defaults. However, this stability often comes at the cost of lower yields. In contrast, ETFs containing lower-rated securities typically deliver higher yields, but they carry greater risks, such as a higher likelihood of defaults or postponed dividends.

When choosing an ETF, it's essential to weigh your income objectives against your comfort with risk. The credit quality of the securities within the ETF has a direct impact on both the dependability of income and the potential to protect your capital.

Are preferred stock ETFs like PFF, PFFD, and PGX suitable for generating income on their own, or should they be part of a broader investment strategy?

Preferred stock ETFs like PFF, PFFD, and PGX can play an important role in an income-focused investment strategy. These funds are known for providing relatively steady dividend payouts and typically experience less price volatility than common stocks, making them attractive to investors seeking consistent cash flow.

That said, relying exclusively on preferred stock ETFs can have its downsides. Many preferred stocks are heavily concentrated in sectors like financial services, which can expose your portfolio to industry-specific risks. For greater stability and to manage risk effectively, it’s a good idea to include these ETFs as part of a broader, diversified portfolio that incorporates various asset classes.

Related Blog Posts

• How does JEPI’s yield and risk profile compare to SCHD and DIVO for an income portfolio?
• SCHD vs VYM vs DGRO vs DIVO - Best dividend ETF for income + dividend growth
• JEPI vs JEPQ vs QYLD vs SPYI - Best covered-call ETF for equity income
• XLP vs VDC vs FSTA - Best consumer staples ETF for recession defense